Diversity Activity Surveys
LAESE - Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy
Undergraduate Engineering Mentor Surveys
Undergraduate Engineering Mentee Surveys
Undergraduate PDQ Surveys
An online SurveyMonkey version of the surveys is available for export. To find out more contact AWE.
Undergraduate Engineering Mentor Surveys
Description | What
do the instruments measure? | Sample
Survey Items | Can the
instruments be modified? | When
is it best to administer the surveys? | IRB
approval | Using the
Results | Download
the Instruments
Downloads: *Revised* Undergraduate
Engineering Mentor Pre-Participation Survey | *Revised* Undergraduate Engineering Mentor Post-Participation Survey| Instrument Instructions
The
Undergraduate Engineering Mentor instruments are used to measure
the impact of peer mentoring (or similar peer support activities)
on the undergraduate women students who serve as the mentors
during peer mentoring.
There are two
versions of this instrument:
- The Undergraduate
Pre Mentor instrument is to be administered before
mentors begin to participate in the mentoring program in
order to collect baseline data on mentors/leaders.
- The Undergraduate
Post Mentor instrument is to be administered to
mentors after or towards the end of participating in the
mentoring program in order to collect data on the impact
of the program on mentors/leaders.
Recommends:
Use both the pre and post mentor surveys in order to see how
participant responses change from one time to the next. Although
you cannot directly attribute these changes to the mentoring
program, these changes do provide some evidence of the programs
effect.
To measure
the impact on the recipients of mentoring – the mentees
-- refer to the Undergraduate Engineering
Mentee Instruments.
Back
To Top
These
instruments ask students to report on the impact of student
mentoring roles on their abilities including:
- Ability
to lead other students
- Ability
to communicate effectively
- Ability
to solve problems that arise during mentoring activities
- Ability
to provide direction and offer productive suggestions
The Mentor
Post Survey also collects “formative” data designed
specifically to determine the extent that the respondent participated
in the activity and her overall satisfaction with the program.
Formative items on the Mentor surveys in particular address:
- Adequacy
of support received to accomplish her responsibilities
- Adequacy
of training received
- Satisfaction
with supervision
- Respondent's
suggestions for improving the activity
Back
To Top
The
Mentor instruments contain both formative items and items designed
to measure the effectiveness of the activity in reaching its
objectives. The following are formative items – that
is, they are designed to collect data that can help improve
your mentoring activity.
The following is a sample item that is designed
to measure objectives for the mentor participants in mentoring
activities – solving problems that arise during mentoring,
and ensuring maximum mentee participation and motivation. These
types of items are included on both the pre and post versions
of the instrument. Items are present in both instrument versions
so that we may determine the change in student responses from
the beginning of the activity (pre survey) to the end (post
survey).
Back
To Top
The
survey questions have been tested and validated, thus they
are not changeable in the downloadable documents. If you do
change them, they are no longer validated, nor are they valid
for national comparative data. However, in order to meet your
specific objectives, you may add additional questions to the
survey such as institutional information and specific, activity-related
questions.
Back
To Top
Administer
both the pre- and post- participation surveys to assess the impact
of your activity.
-
Administer
the Mentor Pre survey before the mentoring program activities
begin.
[tiny logo]AWE Recommends: Administer the Mentor Pre instrument on site
(rather than via mail), as you will get a better survey return rate in
this manner. Be sure to allow time in your schedule for completing the
survey.
-
Administer
the Mentor Post survey at the conclusion of mentoring activities.
Use the following
table of estimated completion times to help plan your data collection.
Survey |
Requires
Approximately |
Mentor
Pre |
10
minutes |
Mentor
Post |
10
minutes |
Whenever you
use any AWE instruments, you are responsible for the well-being
and the privacy of all respondents. Therefore ...
Recommends:
Before collecting any data using AWE instruments, we strongly suggest you obtain IRB
approval.
Back
To Top
Contact the
IRB at your institution - they must answer this question for
you. As with all AWE instruments, a complete review and approval
from your institution’s Institutional Review Board may
be required prior to implementation of this survey. A good rule
of thumb is that if you any data that will be reported outside
your organization, you need IRB approval.
IRB requires
that when you administer surveys, you must educate participants
about possible risks and benefits involved in taking surveys,
obtain their consent before involving them in your research and
keep them informed about how data will be used. This is called
the "informed consent process."
Visit The
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Process page for more
information about the informed consent process and to see examples
of informed consent documents.
Back
To Top
The
instruments contain both "formative" items - that is items
designed to help you improve this activity, and "summative" items
that are designed to ascertain if the activity is meeting its
intended objectives. Using both types of items, you may use
the survey results in the following ways.
- Activity
improvement:
- Examine
results of items that address participant satisfaction
and suggestions to help redesign the activity for maximum
impact.
- Compare
the results of the pre and post surveys to see whether
the activity is meeting its intended objectives and adjust
activity based on the degree to which the activity is
meeting these objectives
- Make evaluation
decisions
- Conduct
a cost benefit analysis - that is, examine the effectiveness
of this activity in meeting its objectives relative to
its cost. Is the cost worth the results you are getting?
- Compare
this activity in terms of its effectiveness to others
your program offers. What is the best way to invest limited
resources? Adjust resources towards activities that are
meeting their intended objectives and supporting your
overall program mission.
- Report
to your stakeholders
- Use
instrument results as authoritative sources of evidence
for funding support and other administrative reporting.
Recommends:
Use your mentor survey results in conjunction with other AWE tools to gain a
more complete understanding of impact!
The AWE Mentor
surveys measures participants’ reports of the impact of
the activity and collects formative data on quality of the activity
organization and implementation--both of which help you to further
develop the activity. You can get even more benefit from your
survey results if you use them in conjunction with results from
other AWE instruments and tools: LAESE, Students
Leaving Engineering,
and Students Persisting in Engineering.
Use ADAPT– which
allows you to track student participation in all of your activities – with
your mentor survey results to determine whether students continue
to participate in the activity and/or whether students who do
continue to participate are recruited or retained at a rate higher
than those who don't.
Use the mentor
survey results in combination with the self-efficacy results
you obtain from the AWE LAESE instrument. Looking at the two
sets of results together can help to measure whether continued
participation impacts engineering self efficacy.
Lastly, compare
the mentor data with profiles of "switchers" from the
Students Leaving Engineering Survey can tell you what percentage
of switchers did or did not participate in the activity. Taken
together, all of these assessment measures provide a powerful
set of tools for evaluation of the activity.
Back
To Top
|